Table of Figures Figure 1. Joust Impact Trace Showing a Mode-5 Failure Response ....................................6 Figure 2. Atlas IIAS Risk Contours for Inner-Ear Injury with A = 3.0.............................. 11 Figure 3. Atlas IIAS Risk Contours for Inner-Ear Injury with A = 3.5.............................. 12 Figure 4. Filter Factor Results for Representative Configurations of Atlas ...................... 23 Figure 5. Combined Random-Attitude and Slow-Tum Results ........................................ 36 Figure 6. Atlas IIAS Breakup Percentages for Random-Attitude Tums ........................... 37 Figure 7. Atlas HAS Impacts with No Breakup ........................................................ ~ ........ 39 Figure 8. Atlas IIAS Impacts with Breakup ......................................................................... 40 Figure 9. Atlas IIAS Simulation Results with B = 1,000 ..................................................... 42 Figure 10. Atlas IIAS Simulation Results with B = 50,000.................................................. 44 Figure 11. Atlas HAS Simulation Results with B = 100,000................................................ 45 Figure 12. Atlas HAS Simulation Results with B = 500,000................................................ 46 Figure 13. Atlas HAS Simulation·Results with B = 5,000,000............................................. 47 Figure 14. Effects of Breakup q-alpha on A for Atlas IIAS ................................................ 49 Figure 15. Mode-5 Density-Function Values at Three Miles ............................................. 51 Figure 16. Atlas IIAS Mode-5 Ship-Hit Contours with A= 3.00 ....................................... 53 Figure 17. Atlas IIAS All-Mode Ship-Hit Contours with A = 3.00.................................... 54 Figure 18. Atlas IIAS Mode-5 Ship-Hit Contours with A= 3.45 ....................................... 55 Figure 19. Atlas IIAS All-Mode Ship-Hit Contours with A= 3.45.................................... 56 Figure 20. Atlas IIAS Mode-5 Ship-Hit Contours with A = 6.30 ....................................... 57 Figure 21. Atlas IIAS All-Mode Ship-Hit Contours with A = 6.30.................................... 58 Figure 22. Impact-Range Distributions .................................................................................. 59 Figure 23. Delta-GEM Breakup· Percentages ....................................................................... 61 Figure 24. Delta-GEM Simulation Results with B ==-1,000.................................................. 62 Figure 25. Delta-GEM Simulation Results with Best-Fit Shaping Constants ................... 63 Figure 26. Titctn·IV Breakup Percentages ................................................................................ 65 Figure 27. Titan·Simulation Results with B = 1,000 ............................................................ 66 Figure 28. Titan Simulation Results with Best-Fit Shaping Constants.............................. 67 Figure 29. LLVl Breakup Percentages ..................................................................................................................... 69 Figure 30. LLVl Simulation Results with B = l,000............................................................ 70 9/10/96 iv RTI
Vision Description (EN)
This is a 'Table of Figures' page from a technical report, listing 30 figures with their titles and page numbers. The figures relate to simulation results, risk contours, and breakup percentages for aerospace systems like Atlas IIAS, Delta-GEM, Titan IV, and LLV1. The page is entirely legible with no redactions or obscured text.
Descrição Vision (PT-BR)
Esta é uma página de 'Table of Figures' (Tabela de Figuras) de um relatório técnico, listando 30 figuras com seus títulos e números de página. As figuras referem-se a resultados de simulação, contornos de risco e porcentagens de desintegração para sistemas aeroespaciais como Atlas IIAS, Delta-GEM, Titan IV e LLV1. A página está inteiramente legível, sem rasuras ou texto obscurecido.