D.3.2 Delta Failure Narratives
The following narratives provide available details about each Delta failure since the
beginning of the Delta program. The narratives are numbered to match the flight-
sequence numbers in Section D.3.1.
1.    Echo I, 13 May 60, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2.5: Attitude control lost during
      second stage coast period. Third stage spun up, but did not fire.
10.   Tiros E, 19 June 62, Response Mode NA, Flight Phase 5: The flight was considered
      a success, although failure of the BTL guidance system resulted in a propellant-
      depletion shutdown of the second stage. The apogee of the final orbit was 175
      miles above the planned value and well outside the three-sigma limit of 76 miles.

24.   S-66, 19 Mar 64, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 3: Spacecraft did not attain orbit.
      Third-stage bum of X-248 motor was interrupted after 23 seconds of a planned 42-
      second bum period.
26.   Imp B, 3 Oct 64, Response Mode NA, Flight Phase 5: The flight was considered a
      partial success, although it failed to reach the desired orbital altitude. The apogee
      was some 52,590 miles below the planned value of 110,000 miles, but perigee was
      within 3 miles of the desired value of 105 miles.
28.   Tiros I, 22 Jan 65, Response Mode NA, Flight Phase 2 and 5: Loss of WECO
      guidance during second-stage burn caused second stage to burn to oxygen
      depletion. As a result, spacecraft was inserted into an elliptical rather than a
      circular orbit.
33.   O50-C, 25 Aug 65, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 2.5: Third stage ignited after
      spin up but before separation from second-stage spin table. Payload did not orbit.
34.   GEOS A, 6 Nov 65, Response Mode NA, Flight Phase 2 and 5: The flight was
      considered a success, although failure of the BTL guidance system during second-
      stage powered flight led to a propellant-depletion shutdown of the stage. Actual
      apogee was 436 miles too high, and well outside the three-sigma limit.
38.   AF-ff, 25 May 66, Response Mode NA, Flight Phase 2 and 5: Due to- WECO
      guidance failure (ground system·Iocked on side lobe), second stage burned to
      propellant depletion, some 12 seconds longer than expected. As a result, the
      orbital apogee was 800 miles higher than planned.
39.   AIMP-D, 1 July 66, Response Mode NA, Flight Phase 2.5 and 5: Although an
      alternate mission was accomplished, primary objectives could not be achieved
      because excess velocity imparted to the spacecraft prevented insertion of the



9/10/96                                    142                                         RTI