← doc
dow-uap-d48-report-september-1996
p036 / 146
              Table 13. Percentage Weighting for Sample of 1186 Launches
    ter          Last       Last 100  Last200 Last 300         I
                                                              i:st 500 Point Ra
    nstant      Point        Points    Points      Points      Points    Last:Fir
    0.999        0.14        13.7      26.1        37.3        56.7      3.3
    0.996        0.40        33.3      55.6        70.6        87.3      1.2 X 1()2
    0.995        0.50       39.5       63.5        78.0        92.1      3.8x 1()2
    0.994        0.60        45.3      70.0        83.6        95.1      1.3x Hf
    0.993        0.70       50.5       75.5        87.9        97.0      4.2 X l(f
    0.992        0.80       55.2       79.9        91.0        98.2      1.4 X 104
    0.991        0.90       59.5       83.6        93.4        98.9      4.5 X 104
    0.990        1.00       63.4       86.6        95.1        99.3      1.5x Hf
    0.980        2.00       86.7 ·     98.2        99.8        99.996    3.9 X 1011

The value of F = 0.999 is considered inappropriate because, as seen in Table 13, the
weighting factor applied to the most recent datum is only 3.3 times that applied to the
oldest test result from 39 years ago. The most recent 200 and 300 points in the sample
comprising 16.8% and 25.2% of the data receive only 26.1% and 37.3% of the total
weight. This is not too different from equal weighting of data, which is appropriate
only if the relative frequency of occurrence of each response mode has not changed
significantly through the years. On the other hand, use of F = 0.99 effectively throws
out the oldest 600 to 700 launches that are sorely needed for an adequate sample size.

The results of the filtering process are given in Table 14 for failures during flight phases
0 - 2.
                 Table 14. Response-Mode Occurrence Percentages
          Filter                     Respcnse Mode
          Factor      1           2         3          4           5
          0.999     7.39        2.27      1.70      73.30       15.34
          0.996     2.24        4.35      0.37      80.37       12.67
          0.995     1.32        4.92      0.19      82.59       10.98
          0.994     0.73        5.26      0.09      84.57        9.35
          0.993     0.39        5.37      0.04      86.25        7.95
          0.992     0.20        5.31      0.02      87.68        6.78
          0.991     0.11        5.13      0.01      88.92        5.84
          0.990     0.05        4.87      0.00      90.02        5.06
          0.980     0.00        1.86      0.00      96.81        1.33

The results in Table 14 show that the percentages of occurrence for response-modes 2
and 4 are relatively insensitive to filter-factor values, while the percentages for
Modes 1, 3, and 5 decrease as filter memory (filter factor) decreases. This suggests that
occurrences of Modes 1, 3, and 5 have been decreasing over the years, while Modes 2
and 4 occurrences have not changed much. Although it cannot be argued convincingly

9/10/96                                     27                                          RTI


Vision Description (EN)

This is a page of technical text from a report, specifically section 6.1.4 regarding 'Malfunction-Turn Results for Atlas IIAS'. The text discusses atmospheric effects, vacuum calculations, and impact distributions for simulated random-attitude turns. There are no redactions or obscured areas on this page, which is fully legible.

Descrição Vision (PT-BR)

Esta é uma página de texto técnico de um relatório, especificamente a seção 6.1.4 referente a 'Malfunction-Turn Results for Atlas IIAS'. O texto discute efeitos atmosféricos, cálculos de vácuo e distribuições de impacto para curvas de atitude aleatória simuladas. Não há rasuras ou áreas obscurecidas nesta página, que está totalmente legível.