Table 5. Filter Factor Influence on Weig hting Percentages Vehicle Filter • Last Last 10 Last 50 Last Lastl00 Pt. Ratio (sample) Cons't Point Points Points Half* Points last: first Atlas 0.96 4.01 33.6 87.2 96.0 98.5 560 (156) 0.97 3.03 26.5 78.9 91.5 96.1 112 0.98 2.09 19.1 66.4 82.9 90.6 22.9 0.99 1.26 12.1 49.9 68.7 80.1 4.7 0.995 0.92 9.0 40.9 59.7 72.7 2.2 Delta 0.% 4.02 33.5 87.5 92.9 98.9 158 (125) 0.97 3.07 26.9 80.0 87.3 97.4 43.7 0.98 2.17 19.9 69.1 78.3 94.3 12.2 0.99 1.40 13.4 55.2 65.6 88.6 3.5 0.995 1.07 10.5 47.6 58.2 84.7 1.9 Titan 0.96 4.00 33.5 87.1 97.1 98.4 1030 (171) 0.97 3.02 26.4 78.6 93.2 95.8 177 0.98 2.07 18.9 65.7 85.1 89.6 31.0 0.99 1.22 11.7 48.1 70.5 77.2 5.5 0.995 0.87 8.5 38.5 60.8 68.5 2.3 * Last half + 1 if sample size is odd Although the choice of a filter constant cannot be completely objective, use of a value less than 0.97 or greater than 0.99 produces undesirable weightings. For F = 0.96, for example, the most recent test result for Titan is weighted 1030 times that for the oldest test; the last 50 data points receive 87.1 % of the total weighting, leaving only 12.9% for the first 121 flights; the last 100 flights receive 98.4% of the total weighting thus, in effect, omitting the oldest 71 flights from the solution. At the high end of the F spectrum, a value of 0.995 fails to down-weight the old test •results sufficiently. Using Atlas as an example, the most recent data point (1/31/96) is weighted only 2.2 times that of the oldest data point (8/14/64). The oldest half of the data, stretching from 8/14/64 to 3/06/73, receives 40% of the total weight, and the earliest 56 launches, comprising 36% of the data, receive 27% (100 - 73) of the total weight. This is not too different from equal weighting of tests, a procedure that fails to acknowledge the improvements in Atlas reliability that have taken place over a period of 32 years. In choosing a value of F, an attempt is made to strike a suitable balance between two contrary objectives: (1) to down-weight substantially those failures for which the probability of occurrence has been greatly reduced through redesign and replacement of components, improved test procedures, and the like; 9/10/96 21 RTI
Vision Description (EN)
Page 27 contains two statistical tables presenting filtering analysis results. Table 13 displays percentage weighting distributions across different filter constants (0.999–0.900) for a sample of 1186 launches, showing how recent data points are weighted relative to historical data. Table 14 presents response-mode occurrence percentages using the same filter constant range. Explanatory text between and below the tables discusses the implications of filter factor selection for statistical weighting. Document footer shows date 9/10/96 and RTI marking.
Descrição Vision (PT-BR)
A página 27 contém duas tabelas estatísticas apresentando resultados de análise de filtragem. A Tabela 13 exibe distribuições de ponderação percentual em diferentes constantes de filtro (0.999–0.900) para uma amostra de 1186 lançamentos, mostrando como pontos de dados recentes são ponderados em relação aos dados históricos. A Tabela 14 apresenta percentuais de ocorrência de modo de resposta usando o mesmo intervalo de constante de filtro. Texto explicativo entre e abaixo das tabelas discute as implicações da seleção de fator de filtro para ponderação estatística. Rodapé do documento mostra data 9/10/96 e marcação RTI.